On Wednesday the House voted 272-152 to pass legislation that will offer up to $300 billion in assistance to troubled homeowners and offer government support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
This is a a 700 page bill that includes many moving parts. President Bush has been long threatening to veto this bill as package and asked that it be revised. It appears that this current version is not going to face any challenges when the President sees it shortly.
Helping At-Risk Borrowers
The part of this bill that is good news for challenged homeowners looking at adjusting interest rates and negative equity involved FHA insuring up to $300 Billion in new 30 year fixed rate mortgages for at-risk borrowers living in owner-occupied homes.
In a nut shell, here are the proposed terms outlined:
- The existing lender must agree to “write down” the balance of the existing loan to 90% of the homes’ current appraised value.
- Lenders must agree to also pay upfront fees to the FHA equal to 3% of the home’s appraised value.
- Borrowers must agree to pay an annual premium to the FHA equal to 1.5% of thier new loan balance.
- Borrowers must agree to share with the government any profit they realize from selling or refinancing.
Helping Hand Holds Comes At A Price
Ok, so is this a cure-all or a “bail out”? It certainly does not seem that way to me. For borrowers that qualify for this program, it will still come at a large cost. For instance, if your home is now worth $250,000 – you must pay $3,750 a year to FHA? Even if they break it up over 12 months that adds $312.50
Add the equity share if you sell or refinance and it starts to get a little less friendly. I saw this in the early 2000′s when folks were just starting to see huge equity increases. One specific case was a county provided silent second mortgage used to purchase the home. It included an equity share clause similar to this one.
The “share” of equity for this particular loan was over $17,000!
Take into consideration also that although prices will continue to drop if left to follow it’s natural course of market correction, it is likely that homes are very close to the bottom in many areas around the U.S. If you “commit” to a loan that is 90% of current appraised value at the “bottom” of the market…..That equity share could mean big bucks!
Historically, Real Estate doubles in value every 10 years. I’m sure this will be the case with many homes in many areas at the significantly deflated prices resulting from this unique collapse of the secondary and credit markets.
It will be interesting to see what happens and how many homeowners it helps…..And don’t let me seemingly pessimistic and cautious reservation about this bill fool you….I see a rainbow!
The Rainbow – The Answer to Short Sales and Loan Modifications
I believe that the passing of this bill is going to help MANY, MANY home owners currently having challenges with their payments, and here’s why.
- This bill is going to force banks to start considering principle reduction as a method of preventing foreclosure.
- This bill puts the responsibility back on the banks to keep people in their homes.
- A Bank participating in this program is forced to pay big fees – 3% of the appraised value
Let me explain. If the banks are already being forced to consider principle reduction (reduce amount of loan to reflect current home values”, why would they pay FHA an additional 3% instead of simply modifying the note themselves?
3% does not seem like a lot of money until you multiply it by tens of thousands of loans. It makes sense to me that if the banks hand is forced, they will accept that principle reduction is a vehicle that will keep their clients (home owners, investors) happy – and they will begin to look for ways to save money….say….3%
What I don’t know is how valuable the Government Mortgage Insurance will be to these banks. As with all legislation, what looks good on paper does not always mean there’s a practical application in a free market society. We will see.
Either way you cut it, i think it will help many home owners stay in their homes. I think it will force banks to do the “right” thing and do what it takes to keep folks in their homes. I believe that it will begin to restore confidence in foreign and domestic investors and bring liquidity back to mortgage backed securities.
There you have it….that’s my .02 – I guess it’s just wait and see time now.
Comments (0)